Comments for mnemonikk.org http://mnemonikk.org My life with the machine Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:46:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 Comment on Recovering data from a broken NTFS hard drive by 嘀咕火兔(2009.09.17-09.18) » 閱思網 - 心理學與生活 Ritzy Studio 博客 http://mnemonikk.org/2009/04/26/recovering-data-from-a-broken-ntfs-hard-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-1698 嘀咕火兔(2009.09.17-09.18) » 閱思網 - 心理學與生活 Ritzy Studio 博客 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:46:20 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=10#comment-1698 [...] mnemonikk.org ? Blog Archive ?… 2009-09-17 [...] [...] mnemonikk.org ? Blog Archive ?… 2009-09-17 [...]

]]> Comment on Live syntax-checking JavaScript with Emacs by Anonymous http://mnemonikk.org/2008/05/06/live-syntax-checking-javascript-with-emacs/comment-page-1/#comment-1674 Anonymous Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:03:47 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=6#comment-1674 And why so little became such interesting blogs, thank you! And why so little became such interesting blogs, thank you!

]]> Comment on Recovering data from a broken NTFS hard drive by _Ana http://mnemonikk.org/2009/04/26/recovering-data-from-a-broken-ntfs-hard-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-591 _Ana Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:27:03 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=10#comment-591 This tutorial deserves great popularity + my closer attention... It's a full-scale proof of competence ;^) This tutorial deserves great popularity
+ my closer attention…
It’s a full-scale
proof of competence ;^)

]]> Comment on Recovering data from a broken NTFS hard drive by Zinovsky http://mnemonikk.org/2009/04/26/recovering-data-from-a-broken-ntfs-hard-drive/comment-page-1/#comment-262 Zinovsky Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:44:16 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=10#comment-262 Hi, Nice article , you have explained ecerything in details, good job. Hi,
Nice article , you have explained ecerything in details, good job.

]]> Comment on Tiling window managers talk by JFM http://mnemonikk.org/2009/03/31/tiling-window-managers-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-226 JFM Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:20:15 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=27#comment-226 One comment on stumpwm: it does support enough of the EWMH standard to be used with gnome-panel, and its groups work with Gnome workspaces. I use it with a full Gnome environment minus Nautilus, and everything works fine. One comment on stumpwm: it does support enough of the EWMH standard to be used with gnome-panel, and its groups work with Gnome workspaces. I use it with a full Gnome environment minus Nautilus, and everything works fine.

]]> Comment on Tiling window managers talk by admin http://mnemonikk.org/2009/03/31/tiling-window-managers-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-225 admin Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:20:00 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=27#comment-225 Oh, I missed that, thery'e up now. Thanks! Oh, I missed that, thery’e up now. Thanks!

]]> Comment on Tiling window managers talk by max http://mnemonikk.org/2009/03/31/tiling-window-managers-talk/comment-page-1/#comment-224 max Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:11:16 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=27#comment-224 the links for the screenshots seems to be broken... the links for the screenshots seems to be broken…

]]> Comment on Finally putting my personal configuration files under version control by admin http://mnemonikk.org/2009/03/23/finally-putting-my-personal-configuration-files-under-version-control/comment-page-1/#comment-222 admin Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:42:31 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=22#comment-222 A valid argument for the symlinking-approach: you can easily opt-out if you want to use a differing config file on some host for some odd reason, so you don't have to worry about unintentionally updating some file if you don't want to. A valid argument for the symlinking-approach: you can easily opt-out if you want to use a differing config file on some host for some odd reason, so you don’t have to worry about unintentionally updating some file if you don’t want to.

]]> Comment on Showing the current directory in Emacs’ mode line by admin http://mnemonikk.org/2008/05/23/showing-the-current-directory-in-emacs-mode-line/comment-page-1/#comment-221 admin Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:36:36 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=7#comment-221 In the mean time I found an even better solution using the uniquify library. <pre lang="lisp"> (require 'uniquify) (setq uniquify-buffer-name-style 'reverse) (setq uniquify-separator "|") (setq uniquify-after-kill-buffer-p t) (setq uniquify-ignore-buffers-re "^\\*") </pre> In the mean time I found an even better solution using the uniquify library.

(require 'uniquify)
 
(setq uniquify-buffer-name-style 'reverse)
(setq uniquify-separator "|")
(setq uniquify-after-kill-buffer-p t)
(setq uniquify-ignore-buffers-re "^\\*")
]]> Comment on Finally putting my personal configuration files under version control by admin http://mnemonikk.org/2009/03/23/finally-putting-my-personal-configuration-files-under-version-control/comment-page-1/#comment-220 admin Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:33:00 +0000 http://mnemonikk.org/?p=22#comment-220 Good point, I haven't thought of that. But the symlinking-approach still has some potential advantages: it's immediately apparent what files are under VC; I can have several repositories, e.g. a repository that I want to make public, and one for private data. Fortunately, emacs sees that the symlinks lead to version controlled files, so this is only mildly inconvenient. But still, good point. Good point, I haven’t thought of that. But the symlinking-approach still has some potential advantages: it’s immediately apparent what files are under VC; I can have several repositories, e.g. a repository that I want to make public, and one for private data. Fortunately, emacs sees that the symlinks lead to version controlled files, so this is only mildly inconvenient. But still, good point.

]]>